Research and Development (R&D) Policy:
Techno International New Town is a reputed institute known for delivering top-notch technical education for more than twenty years. To fulfill the institution's Vision and Mission, it's crucial to establish a strong foundation for excellent research endeavors and encourage a culture of research among students and faculty alike. The main goal of the institution's research and development efforts is to nurture a spirit of inquiry and support the professional development of both teachers and students. Through these initiatives, Techno International New Town aims to promote a vibrant research culture that benefits everyone involved in the learning process.
Improving high-quality scientific and technological research is essential for addressing societal needs effectively. The Institute emphasizes excellence in research and innovation. Alongside traditional research and development efforts, there's a clear focus on advancing both technical knowledge and addressing societal challenges. Our dedication lies in promoting research that positively impacts society. To strengthen our research culture, the local management committee, led by the Head of Institute (HOI), has appointed Coordinators for Research and Development, Industry Relations, Faculty Development, IPR, and Entrepreneurship. They are tasked with shaping policies and initiating various research and development projects while ensuring the institute's research vision is communicated effectively across all departments.
1. Roles and Responsibilities of the R & D Cell:
The R&D Cell holds pivotal roles and responsibilities within the institution, facilitating the advancement of research and development initiatives. Its primary duties include:
2. Primary objectives of the R & D cell:
3. Roles of IQAC in R & D: The Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) plays a crucial role in Research and Development (R&D) within an academic or research institution. Here are some of the key roles of IQAC in R&D:
Overall, IQAC plays a pivotal role in ensuring the effectiveness, integrity, and impact of R&D initiatives within an institution, contributing to its academic excellence and reputation in the research community.
4. R & D Cell’s Vision/Mission:
5. R & D Cell Committee Members:
R & D cell has been established since inception of the college. The constituent members of the present Institutional R&D Cell are as follows -
Sl. No. | Name of the Member | Institute/Department Affiliation | Member designation |
1. | Prof.(Dr.) Ayan Chakraborty | Principal | Chairman |
2. | Prof. (Dr.) Manabendra Maiti | Prof. ECE Department | Coordinator (R&D) |
3. | Prof.(Dr.) Swagata Paul | Academic Coordinator, Head, CSE Dept. | R&D Head, CSE Dept. |
4. | Prof.(Dr.) Pradip K. Ghosh | Academic Head, ECE Dept. | R&D Head, ECE Dept. |
5. | Prof.(Dr.) Nilanjan De | Associate Prof., CSE Dept. | Member (Research collaboration In-charge) |
6. | Prof.(Dr.) SatyabrataMaity | Associate Prof., IT Dept. | Member |
7. | Prof. (Dr.) Papia Debnath | Associate Prof., BSH Dept. | Member (IPR In-charge) |
8. | Prof.(Dr.) Sayantika Bose Chakraborty | Academic Head, BSH Dept. | Member |
9. | Prof. Ipsita Ghatak | Academic Head, MBA Dept. | Member (Business Incubation In charge) |
10. | Prof.(Dr). T. K. Nandi | Academic Head, ME Dept. | R&D Head, ME Dept. |
11. | Prof (Dr.) Milan Basu | Academic Head, EE Dept. | R&D Head, EE Dept |
12. | Prof. Bikash Sadhukhan | Assistant Prof. CSE Dept. | Member |
13. | Prof. (Dr.) Sanjoy Das Neogi | Academic Head, CE Dept. | R&D Head, CE Dept. |
14. | Prof. Indrajit Pandey | Academic Head, AEIE Dept. | R&D Head, AEIE Dept. |
15. | Prof.(Dr.) Partha Pratim Chakraborty | Assistant Prof. BSH Dept. | Member |
16. | Prof. Hemanta De | Assistant Prof. MCA Dept. | Member |
17 | Dr. Amlan Ghosh | Academic Head, MCA Dept. | R&D Head, MCA Dept. |
18 | Dr. Nilanjana Dutta Roy | Associate Prof. CSE Dept. | Member |
19 | DrArpita Chattopadhyay | Assistant Prof. BSH Dept. | Member |
20 | Prof. Debashis Biswas | Assistant Prof. EE Dept. | Member |
21 | Dr. RatnaMondal | Assistant Prof. IT Dept. | Member |
22 | Dr Soma Bose Biswas | Associate Prof. MBA Dept. | Member |
23 | Dr. Nirmalya Maity | Associate Prof. IT Dept | Member |
24 | Dr. Shyamasree Biswas Raha | Assistant Prof. EE Dept. | Member |
25 | Vivekananda Mukherjee | Assistant Prof. ECE Dept. | Convener |
6. Norms and Standards for the Research Grant Policy:
R&D Budget Break-up | ||
Sl.No. | Category | Expenditure (%) |
1 | Internal Research Project | 20% |
2 | Faculty Deputation and sponsorship, Training/STTP/Workshop/Seminar etc.: | 20% |
3 | Seminar/Conference/Workshop/FDP/Expert talk organized by the R&D cell | 25% |
4 | Project Competition/ Hackathon/ research article competition etc. | 25% |
5 | Contingency and other expenses | 10% |
Institutional R & D budget is prepared based on the requisition received from the respective departmental R & D cell. The distribution of R & D budget duly approved by the BOG is as follows:
TINT management has approved funds to back academic research endeavors across diverse fields. This program aims to elevate research efforts, especially among junior faculty, and encourage them to seek substantial grants from different funding agencies. Below are the standards and guidelines of the scheme provided to assist faculty members in preparing their proposals.
Guidelines for Internal Research Proposal:
Policy Guidelines for support to Faculty to attend conferences in India:
The faculty of Techno International New Town is encouraged to be actively engaged in research and enhance and broaden their knowledge by participating in seminars/ workshops/ conferences. Research finds its expression through publications in learned journals and through presentation of papers in Conferences and Seminars.
The following Policy Guidelines are laid down for providing financial support to faculty members for attending Conferences / Seminars in India.
i) The applicant has been invited to chair one or more sessions.
ii) The applicant has been invited to deliver a keynote /plenary/inaugural address:
iii) The applicant has been invited to present the paper / papers in the International / National Conference:
a) Synopsis and a copy of the Paper to be presented.
b) Certificate from the Author about originality of paper and “No Objection”
c) Brochures of Seminar /Conference
d) Letter of Acceptance / Invitation from the organizers
e) Detailed information about the organizers of the International Conference/ Seminar and their credibility
f) Expenditure details: Registration Fee, Travel Fare, Boarding & lodging/other expenses and detailed
recommendation of the Head of the Institution
Table: Performance Evaluation Rubrics for TINT Researchers:
*Engineering and Basic science discipline Journal:
Sl.No | Criteria Max. Marks=10 for each | Satisfactory (7 Marks) | Good (8 Marks) | Very Good (9 Marks) | Excellent (10 Marks) |
1. | Journal Publications | Web of Science/UGC Care. | SCOPUS/ESCI | SCI/SSCI/SCIE (IF≤1) | SCI/SSCI/SCIE (IF≥ 1) |
2. | Technical Expertise (UG/PG/Ph.D.) | Seminars/ Workshops /Conferences Attended | Memberships of Technical Societies (IEEE, IETE, ASME, CSI, ACM etc.) | Technical Certification Courses done apart from Ph.D. coursework. (AICTE/MAKAUT/UGC/Renowned foreign Institutes) | |
3. | National Level Exams Passed | -- | RET | GATE | UGC/CSIR NET etc |
*Faculty/student will get partial financial benefits.
Conference:
1. | Conferences (Presentation/ Publication) | Presentation/publication in International Conference | Faculty presentation mandatory and must be first author. Exception for student authorship. | Partial financial benefits |
2. | Externally hosted project/research/ article/idea competition award (other than hackathon) | Financial benefit upto Rs. 2000/- |
Journals in English Language & Literature ranking:
For the above criteria the faculty should be:
and the work must be published with TINT affiliation.
Guidelines for Expenditure on Research for Funded Projects:
The faculty will be authorized to present the shortlisted research proposals only if the faculty applied to the research funding scheme through TINT and specified TINT as an affiliation on the proposal.
Publications: Faculty members publishing papers in reputable journals indexed in SCI/SCOPUS/UGC Care with a non-zero impact factor listed by Thompson Reuter’s Journal Citation Index (JCI) are eligible for financial assistance according to the Journal rubrics table below.
Additionally, for faculty publishing papers in renowned conferences, the college may sponsor publication or registration fees, capped at a maximum of Rs. 10,000 per financial year.
A faculty member publishes a paper in an Indian conference cited by Scopus, he/she will receive Travel Allowance (TA) and Daily Allowance (DA), along with On-Duty leave for the duration required to attend the conference.
The college does not provide sponsorship for conferences held outside India. However, faculty members may apply for sponsorship for national or international conferences and seminars organized within India.
Authors must cite others' work, even if they contributed to it as co-authors, editors, advisers, or students. All types of others' work, whether published or unpublished and in any format (written, oral, website), should be cited or credited. TINT employs “Drillbit software” to ensure submitted papers are plagiarism-free. UGC guidelines exclude certain elements from plagiarism checks, including public domain quotes, references, minor similarities, generic terms, and standard equations.
Fabrication and falsification in research are serious misconducts, requiring researchers to prioritize accuracy and transparency. Predicted outcomes should not be prematurely published, and complete records of data should be maintained for evaluation of subsequent reports or conclusions. In laboratory research, data is typically recorded in indexed lab notebooks with detailed techniques and material documentation. Mistakes should be clearly marked and corrected, while all data should be contemporaneously recorded and securely stored. Unique materials must be properly labeled and stored. Social sciences and clinical biology face privacy challenges with coded data, necessitating transparent procedures for data access and redaction. Main data, including records and questionnaires, should be available for examination, with redaction possible to protect privacy. Access to redaction rules and processes should be provided for data reviewers to ensure transparency and integrity.
Researchers must be proficient in quantitative data processing, ensuring accurate graphical and tabular displays, error analysis, and reliability testing. All conclusions should stem from precisely documented facts, with full disclosure of relevant observations, including contradictory or unsupportive data. Failure to disclose such data, especially regarding confounding factors, constitutes research integrity breach. Validated explanations for disregarding data, backed by accepted statistical tests, must accompany published reports. Negative outcomes should be widely published. Deliberate misrepresentation of observations or image manipulation is considered research misconduct. Altering approved protocols or study designs without prior approval is improper and may constitute misconduct. Misusing government grant funds for fabricated research is both unethical and a federal crime, potentially resulting in prosecution, restitution, fines, and/or imprisonment.
Research data generated by TINT employees are owned by TINT, even after researchers have left. This is because TINT is the grantee of sponsored research awards. However, all members of the research group should have reasonable access to the data. If copyright or patent potential exists, a written agreement within the group should outline intellectual property rights. Researchers with patentable findings should submit an Invention Disclosure to TINT's IPR Cell.
Data should be securely stored for at least five years after project completion, final report submission, or research publication, as per sponsor requirements. Certain data may need depositing in the Institute library.
Publication of research findings is essential for academic discourse, enabling other researchers to build on reported results. Institute scientists have an ethical obligation to adhere to publishing standards, ensuring thoroughness for result replication. Timely publication is crucial, but not at the expense of proper internal validation or interpretation assessment. While commercial sponsors can't veto publication, a six-month delay may accommodate patent application submission.
All authors must be duly acknowledged in the publication, with co-authorship reflecting individual contributions. Authorship standards, often set by professional organizations and publications, typically require contribution to research topic formulation, data interpretation, report drafting, and readiness to defend the publication.
Authorship order conventions vary by discipline, but it's essential that all co-authors agree on the sequence beforehand. A corresponding or senior author typically listed first or last, should be designated for each paper. This individual is responsible for liaising with publishers, updating co-authors on review and publication status, and ensuring everyone approves the submitted manuscript. The corresponding author bears greater responsibility for the research integrity and must thoroughly comprehend and defend all aspects of the study.
Authors should avoid misrepresenting the status of their unpublished work. A manuscript should not be labeled as submitted until officially submitted. Similarly, it shouldn't be labeled as accepted for publication or in press unless the author has received confirmation from the editor or publisher, including galley or page proofs or an approval letter. This ensures accuracy and integrity in presenting the manuscript's status to the academic community.
Publishing the same paper in multiple places without proper citation or editor notification is discouraged, unless justified. Similarly, abstracts should not be replicated without acknowledgment. Inexplicable replication, termed self-plagiarism, can mislead readers about original research data. Submitting the same paper to multiple journals simultaneously is generally considered unethical across disciplines. Clear communication and proper citation are essential to maintain integrity in scholarly publishing.
All academic community members must report suspected research misconduct to the Dean (R&D) as per Institute policy. Allegations are addressed confidentially, with no repercussions against those reporting in good faith. Confidentiality is prioritized, ensuring a fair process for all involved.
Institute Ethics committees must pre-approve human subject research protocols, ensuring acceptable risks and accurate, understandable communication of risks and benefits to participants.
The institute established the Intellectual Property Right cell (IPR) and Business Incubation Cell from its inception, supported by college management. The goal of IPR/BI is to aid incubates in establishing successful businesses by collaborating with various partners and service providers. The center conducts seminars to educate students on financing, startup environments, incubation, and related services. BIC encourages students to submit innovative ideas for incubation, which undergo screening and further consideration. Proposals are evaluated based on potential, practicality, value proposition, and market assessment. These initiatives aim to ignite the region's Innovation & Entrepreneurship ecosystem, fostering creativity, business acumen, and collaboration among students and partners.
The provided document outlines an Intellectual Property Rights Policy for Techno International New Town, Kolkata. Here's a summary:( The details report is available in the IPR Cell):
Preamble: Intellectual property is crucial for providing a competitive edge to an organization. The policy aims to guide staff, students, and outside agencies on intellectual property rights (IPR) practices and rules to promote academic freedom and research development.
Scope: The policy aims to create an environment conducive to developing intellectual property, safeguarding academic freedom, and establishing standards for intellectual property management.
Objectives: The objectives include promoting academic freedom, providing a reference system for IPR issues, ensuring fair distribution of returns from intellectual property, introducing IP management practices, providing legal support, and fostering innovation.
Intellectual Property and Ownership: The policy addresses copyright ownership for various works and outlines ownership rules for patents, emphasizing the Institute's ownership in certain cases.
IP Protection and Technology Transfer: Procedures for IP protection, patent filing, and technology transfer are detailed, including the involvement of committees and consultants.
Registration of Patents and Copyrights: Guidelines for filing patent applications in India and foreign countries are provided, along with provisions for financial support.
Revenue Sharing: Revenue sharing arrangements are outlined, including options for creators to reinvest in new research projects.
IPR Administration: The legal status, structure of advisory/review committees, role of consultants, infringement resolution, and dispute resolution mechanisms are detailed.
Overall, the policy aims to foster innovation, protect intellectual property rights, and ensure fair distribution of benefits within the Institute.
Innovation is paramount in the 21st century, with TINT dedicated to fostering a sustainable innovation ecosystem. Through exposure to new ideas and processes, TINT encourages young students, nurturing their innovative potential. Leveraging the problem-solving skills and entrepreneurial acumen of students and faculty, TINT promotes robust intra and inter-institutional partnerships. Aligned with the National Innovation and Start-up Policy of India, and in coordination with AICTE and UGC policies, TINT focuses on enhancing its innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem. As a pioneer in West Bengal, TINT has formally adopted the National Innovation and Start-up Policy 2021, establishing an Institution Innovation Cell (IIC) to cultivate an innovative culture among students and faculty.
By participating in this initiative, TINT becomes part of a nationwide network fostering innovation and entrepreneurship, enriching the experiences of its students and faculty.
R&D Cell Structure